one internet portal. all fisheries research. 
 
Home | All Topics | Help | FAQ 
DONORS / PROJECTSAQUACULTUREFRESHWATER FISHERIESMARINE AND COASTAL FISHERIESUTILIZATION AND TECHNOLOGYSTAKEHOLDERS / ORGANISATIONSVIRTUAL OFFICES
back up one level Home: VIRTUAL OFFICES: Support unit Int. Fish. Aquat. Res.: oneFish: Documents
 
        
This topic `collects' all documents that have been individually added or referenced in oneFish, imported from other systems, and those `collected' from provider systems. Some may be references only to published material, some may also include abstracts or brief descriptions and some may include a link to the full-text document either on a remote site or uploaded in the oneFish database. Click on the link below for further information about contributing documents to oneFish:
 
Additional LinksAdding Knowledge
CollectorString=(in:243147 OR kot:documents) AND (kot:documents OR kot:events OR kot:institution OR kot:jobs OR kot:maps OR kot:news OR kot:projects OR kot:"web-sites") AND isarchived:n
TitleDo conventional prescriptions of the rights-based fishing literature pose legal and political impediments to policy change%3F  ( Document )
Author(s) / Editor(s)Matulich, S.C.; Macdonald, J.
DescriptionA serious impediment blocks advancement of individual transferable quota (ITQ) policy in the United States, particularly in North Pacific fisheries being considered for ITQ management. The traditional ITQ design, that allocates rights to only the harvesting sector, unintentionally expropriates wealth/property interests from the co-dependent-processing sector. This regulatory expropriation is a substantive policy flaw that renders the traditional ITQ design constitutionally suspect and subject to attack in the courts on grounds that such policy would require “just compensation” under the Fifth Amendment. The expropriation mechanism is briefly outlined following a reflective glance at the origins of ITQ policy. Then, this expropriating ITQ policy is shown to be at opposing purposes with, and even partially induced by, prior to government fishery policies. Finally, arguments underlying a Fifth Amendment takings claim are set in the context of four strands of judicial precedent.
Keywords&
Geography Keywords&GLOBAL
Content Language(s)English
PublisherOffice Nationale de la Peche, Maroc (ONP, Morocco)
Publication LocationCasablanca, Morocco
Publication Date2002
Hard Copy AvailabilityContact IIFET@oregonstate.edu
  
 Editor(s)
 ·Chief Editor
 Topic Info
 · ID: 243147
 · Visits: 4590
 · Added: 14 March 2005
 · Updated: 11 April 2005
 · URL: http://www.onefish.org/id/243147
 KO Owner
 · Duc Phan
 KO Info
 · ID: 263653
 · Visits: 4
 · Added: 23 May 2005
 · Updated: 23 May 2005
 · URL: http://www.onefish.org/id/263653
 
57656 Knowledge Objects - 1429 Members - 81 Editors - 1025 Topics

Home : About oneFish : Email Alerts : Help

How to: Add Topics : Add Knowledge : Adopt a Topic : Search : Reporting a Problem

Copyright © 1999-2005 Support unit for International Fisheries and Aquatic Research (SIFAR ) - Disclaimer